Front shocks

Discussions & announcements

Moderator: bobassel

Post Reply
David Welch
Posts: 171
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:23 pm
Contact:

Front shocks

Post by David Welch »

Does any one have a extra set of front shocks, or know what can be used as a new replacement
Thanks David W
David Welch
GPW 77710
M29C 7195
Dukw 353-22096
Bantam trailer
GPA 1359
GlennV
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 11:26 am
Contact:

Re: Front shocks

Post by GlennV »

Hi David,

To my knowledge, i would say that normal jeep shockabsorbers are the same for GPA.

Best regards,
Glenn
Ford GPA - SN 5892 - DOD Jan 14 1943
Willys MB - SN 456307 - DOD July 30 1945
David Welch
Posts: 171
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Front shocks

Post by David Welch »

I have been told that the front ones are different. Closed they are 8 1/4 inch and open 16 inch.
Thanks David
David Welch
GPW 77710
M29C 7195
Dukw 353-22096
Bantam trailer
GPA 1359
GPA2196
Posts: 273
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Front shocks

Post by GPA2196 »

They are indeed different from GPW front shocks (the rears are the same as GPW) The front shocks are marked GPA and I believe amphibian. I believe they are heavier duty than the GPW. Unfortunately I do not have an extra set David, I sold off my spares.

Tony
Last edited by GPA2196 on Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
leo verhagen
C-SICK
Posts: 260
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 8:18 am
Contact:

Re: Front shocks

Post by leo verhagen »

David, Tony,

I was lucky I had both original GPA front shocks with my GPA, still in good working order.
The were F marked, made by Gabriel and on the top "Model GPA Amphibian".
These shocks are indeed havier duty then on the jeep.

Sorry, I have no spare ones, and have no info on a replacement model.
Here is a photo of the front shocks for reference:
Image
Regards,

Leo Verhagen

http://communities.zeelandnet.nl/data/fordgpa/index.php

Ford GPA#8787 d.o.d. 27 Feb '43
Ford GPW#87243 d.o.d. 21 December '42
Willys MBT waiting for restoration
fordgpa
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 192
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 8:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Front shocks

Post by fordgpa »

David , When restoring mine I took of the shocks cleaned them to put them back.
I took a brand new jeep shock compared them and they are the same to me .
The story I was told that they are locked for the down travel, so the front axel does go to deep when swimming.
I don t believe this because it is also limited by the spring action.
If I am correct the Jeep are a little shorter [war production]
if you look in the TM jeep and GPA you can see that it is about 1/4 inch different in travel compressed and extented less then 1/2 inch.
So I would say take new front shocks jeep /gpw and nothing to worry about.

Peter
Cees
Posts: 194
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 8:50 am
Contact:

Re: Front shocks

Post by Cees »

fordgpa wrote: The story I was told that they are locked for the down travel, so the front axel does go to deep when swimming.
I don t believe this because it is also limited by the spring action.
Peter
Peter,

I disagree with you. I think that the max.lenght for the shocks are very important for the drag link. If you use normal GPW shocks the drag link hit the seal when floating. Then you need the extended bell crank shaft from Richard.

Cees
1941 Ford GP,
1943 Ford GPA #6849,
1943 Ford GPA # 7741,
1943 Harley WLC,
Dodge WC57,
1942 BMW R75,
1942 KS750,
1944 VW 166,
1940 Hanomag 20b,

http://www.filmprops.nl/produkten/fordgpa.htm
fordgpa
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 192
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 8:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Front shocks

Post by fordgpa »

Cees , you have a point joker

Peter
David Welch
Posts: 171
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Front shocks

Post by David Welch »

The TM lists the MB/GPW front shock as 10 9/16 closed and 16 1/8 open
The measurement of my front GPA shock is 8 1/4 closed and 16 open
I think that Richard offers a extended bell crank that raises the rod up and off the seal .
I think the gpa was produced in late 42 until mid 1493 and the extended bell crank was a later design for the field modification kit that allowed jeeps to use the capstan winch. It raises the tie rods up so the pto shaft can make a clean run from the front pulley. I guess that Richard found that this also solves the design problem of the gpa where the bell crank rod rubs on the boot with the correct shocks.
Looking at the above numbers it looks like the difference is in the closed position--when the GPA is on land with MB/GPW shocks
David
David Welch
GPW 77710
M29C 7195
Dukw 353-22096
Bantam trailer
GPA 1359
Cees
Posts: 194
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 8:50 am
Contact:

Re: Front shocks

Post by Cees »

David some pictures from my work GPA the axel is hanging free.
Image
Wheels straight. It has 1/4 inch free from the boot
Image
Wheels to the left
Image
Wheels to the right

Cees
1941 Ford GP,
1943 Ford GPA #6849,
1943 Ford GPA # 7741,
1943 Harley WLC,
Dodge WC57,
1942 BMW R75,
1942 KS750,
1944 VW 166,
1940 Hanomag 20b,

http://www.filmprops.nl/produkten/fordgpa.htm
David Welch
Posts: 171
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Front shocks

Post by David Welch »

Image
I think with Richards solution the new bell crank raises the rod about an inch.
David Welch
GPW 77710
M29C 7195
Dukw 353-22096
Bantam trailer
GPA 1359
richardfs
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Front shocks

Post by richardfs »

The extrended bell crank shaft I make raises the drag link 1"3/8 (36mm)

This centres the draglink in the boot so it is not pinned by the drag link when the weight comes of the wheels.

On my original GPA I did not have the original shock absorbers. I had no choice but to fit ordinary GPW ones. It did not have this bell crank shaft modification but the spring setting was critical or the boot could be damaged when the weight was of the wheels.

I think you would be quite safe fitting standard shockabsorbers as long as you check your spring settings. To be safe fit the extended bell crank shaft.

Best regards
Richard Sanders
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests